2. which statement accurately describes one reason a delegation of authority may be needed?
A. When the incident scope is complex or beyond existing authorities
B. If the Incident Commander is acting within his or her existing authorities
C. To specify the Incident Action Plan to be implemented by the Incident Commander
D. To relieve the granting authority of the ultimate responsibility for the incident
Answer: The right answer is option A. When the incident scope is complex or beyond existing authorities.
answer for Which statement 2. which statement accurately describes one reason a delegation of authority may be needed? is A. When the incident scope is complex or beyond existing authorities.
2. which statement accurately describes one reason a delegation of authority may be needed? Explanation:
Task delegation is an art. Without proper delegation it is extremely unlikely that a person or setup can improve their capacity to deliver and improve the quality of the delivery. It is a way to build the next level of management or command structure in the organisation. The next level of leaders are trained and nurtured through carefully deligating more responsible, more challenging tasks to build their capability and confidence to take on more responsble roles in the organisation. It is therefore, importannt to build the culture of delegation in the organisation so that the furure leaders are built in a natural and risk free manner in course of time and more importantly in-house. If leaders are not nurtured in-house, often an organisation needs to hire externals. While that is okay, it deprives the organisation from the opportunity to give chance to their internal members which is a excellent way to keep employees or team members happy and loyal to the organisation.
However, one must be careful while delegating work downward to upward in hierarchy chain. One must ask the following questions and satisfy himself or herself before deligating the task:
- Does the person have the ability to perform the task?
Before delegating a task, one needs to be sure that the person employee has the skillset required to acomplish it.
- Does the person has the knowledge and training required?
Even though you are competent and know how to complete the task, the delegate must have the required training to person the task.
- Does the delegate have all the tools necessary to complete the task?
often it is overlooked whether the delegate has the tools necessar to the task. A manager or a senior may may be having the access to the required tool sets needed, it is unwise to assume the delegate would have them by default. Need to check if that is the caseor else need to ensure these tools available at his/her disposal.
- Have you included a deadline?
Setting proper expection is important. Often delegates may not be having full context of the task you are delegating, the importance or urgency ot it. You may not assume the delegate will understand on his or her own. Mayke sure you ste the expection absolutely cristal clear in terms of date and time so that there are no surprises.
- Can your employee complete the task by the deadline you established?
Make sure the deadline is realistic and agreed upon mutually with the delegate. You may not expect the same level of effeciency from a delegate who is assigned a task first time.
When task is complex and involved, it becomes almost unavoidable to delegate the task. Invoolving trained and effective manpower instead ensure timely and effecient compelition of the task without hampering the project delivery critical path. So, in most cases while deleigation is an optional and way of training junior team members, at times that becomes only way to save the day.
Option B is not a valid reason for delegation of authority, as the Incident Commander already has existing authorities.
Option C describes the purpose of the Incident Action Plan, which is a key component of incident management but not a reason for delegation of authority.
Option D is not a valid reason for delegation of authority, as the granting authority retains ultimate responsibility for the incident regardless of whether authority is delegated to others.